Gdoc/Admin

Popular pages

Research and data to make progress against the world’s largest problems.

14,359 charts across 123 topicsAll free: open access and open source

Our Mission

What do we need to know to make the world a better place?

To make progress against the pressing problems the world faces, we need to be informed by the best research and data.

Our World in Data makes this knowledge accessible and understandable, to empower those working to build a better world.

Read about our mission

We are a non-profit — all our work is free to use and open source. Consider supporting us if you find our work valuable.

Donate to support us
As seen on
Logos of the publications that have used our content. From left to right: Science, Nature, PNAS, BBC, Financial Times, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Atlantic, and The Washington Post

Data Insights

Bite-sized insights on how the world is changing, published every few days.

See all Data Insights
A bar chart depicting the estimated deaths in famines, categorized by continent. The horizontal axis represents decades from the 1870s to the 2020s, while the vertical axis indicates the number of deaths, spanning from 0 to 30 million.

The bars represent different continents with distinct colors: South America is represented in a dark red hue, North America in orange, Africa in purple, Europe in blue, and Asia in green. 

Key trends highlighted in the chart include:
- Until the mid-20th century, famines caused millions and millions of deaths, especially in Asia.
- In recent decades, the death toll from famines has decreased significantly, averaging around one million deaths per decade, particularly in Africa.

The chart includes a source note stating that the data is from the World Peace Foundation (2025), and indicating that the figure for the 2020s is preliminary and only reflects data from 2020 to 2023.

Famines kill far fewer people today than they did in the past, but remain a major threat

Famines are still a major global problem. From 2020 to 2023 alone, they caused over a million deaths.

Yet the long-term trend shows significant progress. In the late 1800s and the first half of the 1900s, it was common for famines to kill over 10 million people per decade. This was true as recently as the 1960s, when China’s Great Leap Forward became the deadliest famine in history.

But as you can see in the chart, that number has dropped sharply, to about one to two million per decade.

This improvement is even more striking given that the world’s population has grown substantially. Despite many more people living on Earth, far fewer die from famines than before.

This progress has resulted from various factors, including increased food production, poverty reduction, fewer conflicts, and more accountable governments.

Learn more about why fewer people die from famines today

Continue reading
A world map highlights regions in Sub-Saharan Africa where malaria was the leading cause of death for children under five years old in 2021. Countries affected are shaded in red against a lighter gray background. A text overlay states that in Nigeria, malaria led to over 190,000 deaths among children under five in 2021, more than any other cause. The data source is identified as IHME, Global Burden of Disease, 2024, with a CC BY license noted at the bottom.

Despite being preventable and treatable, malaria is the leading cause of child mortality in much of Sub-Saharan Africa

In 2021, malaria was the leading cause of death among children under five in more than 20 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.

In Nigeria, over 125,000 young children died from it — that’s 340 every day, one child around every four minutes. The country accounts for one-third of all under‑5 malaria deaths in the world.

Malaria is both preventable and treatable. But millions of children still lack access to basic protection: bed nets, timely treatment, and safe living conditions. We’ve seen malaria eliminated elsewhere.

The tools exist; the challenge is getting them to those who need them most.

Read more from my colleague Max Roser on why progress is possible — and how each of us can contribute

Continue reading
A line graph showing the estimated number of one-year-olds who have received vaccinations for various diseases from 1980 to 2023. The y-axis represents the number of vaccinations in millions, ranging from 0 to 140 million.

The lines are color-coded: the blue line represents the total number of one-year-olds, while a dark red line indicates the number vaccinated against measles. Additional light gray lines represent vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae b, rubella, and rotavirus.

A consistent rise is observed in all vaccination categories, with the most recent data indicating over a hundred million one-year-olds have received the measles vaccine. 

Data is sourced from the United Nations, World Population Prospects (2024), World Health Organization (WHO), and UNICEF (2024). The visualization is licensed under CC BY and published by Our World in Data.

Over a hundred million infants receive measles vaccines annually, protecting them and communities against a deadly disease

Over 100 million infants are vaccinated against measles every year, which means more than 80% of one-year-olds are protected from this potentially life-threatening disease. This global effort has saved millions of lives.

That scale should be reassuring. Measles vaccines are safe and reduce the risk of infection by over 95%, making them one of our most powerful tools to prevent childhood deaths. Outbreaks have become increasingly rare in many countries, global infant mortality has fallen, and measles vaccination alone is estimated to have saved more than 94 million lives.

But that progress is under threat: vaccination rates have fallen in recent years, as the chart shows, and fewer children are getting the protection they need. When coverage slips, measles spreads rapidly; more children suffer and die from a disease we can easily prevent.

Read my colleague Hannah’s article on the number of lives saved by childhood vaccinations

Continue reading
A chart illustrates the improvement of AI systems in performing longer software tasks over time. The horizontal axis spans from 2019 to mid 2025, marking the development of various AI models, such as GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and several iterations of GPT-4. The vertical axis indicates the length of time in minutes that tasks  take human professionals. Key points highlighted include:

- "GPT 3.5 (which came out in Spring 2022) could only do tasks that take humans a few seconds, such as selecting the right file"
- "OpenAI's o3(which came out in April 2025) can do tasks on its own that take humans 20 minutes," such as finding and fixing small bugs in code
- The observed trend shows a rapid progression in AI capability

Accompanying notes indicate that the data is based on 170 tasks across fields like software engineering and machine learning. The source for this data is the Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR) from 2025, presented under a Creative Commons attribution license.

The length of software tasks AI systems can do on their own has been increasing quickly

How will artificial intelligence (AI) impact people’s jobs?

This question has no simple answer, but the more AI systems can independently carry out long, job-like tasks, the greater their impact will likely be.

The chart shows a trend in this direction for software-related tasks. The length of tasks — in terms of how long they take human professionals — that AIs can do on their own has increased quickly in the past couple of years.

Before 2023, even the best AI systems could only perform tasks that take people around 10 seconds, such as selecting the right file.

Today, the best AIs can fairly reliably (with an 80% success rate) do tasks that take people 20 minutes or more, such as finding and fixing bugs in code or configuring common software packages.

It’s unclear how much these results generalize; other factors, like reliability, need to be considered.

But AI capabilities continue to improve, and if developments keep pace for the next few years, we could see systems capable of performing tasks that take people days or even longer.

Read more about how we can help make our future with AI go well

Continue reading
A line graph illustrates the share of new cars sold that are electric in three regions: China, the European Union, and the United States from 2020 to 2023. The vertical axis indicates the percentage of electric cars, ranging from 0% to 40%, with marked points at 2%, 6%, 10%, and 22%. 

In 2020, China starts at 2%, showing a steady upward trend, culminating at 38% in 2023. The European Union begins similarly at 6%, increasing to 22% by 2023. The United States, starting at 2%, progresses to 10% over the same period, showing the slowest growth among the three.

The graph highlights China's significant lead over both the EU and the US in the adoption of electric cars. 

Data source is the International Energy Agency, specifically from the Global EV Outlook 2024 report. A note indicates that in China and the EU, two-thirds of these cars are fully electric, while in the US, 80% are.

China is moving much faster on electric cars than the EU or the United States

Road transport is responsible for around three-quarters of global carbon dioxide emissions from transport. Switching from petrol and diesel to electric vehicles is an important solution to decarbonize our economies.

This chart shows the change in share of new cars that were electric in China, the European Union (EU), and the United States (US) between 2020 and 2023. This includes fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars, though most are fully electric.

In 2020, electric cars were rare everywhere. But by 2023, over one-third of new vehicles in China were electric, compared to less than a quarter in the EU and under a tenth in the US.

While we only have annual data up to 2023, preliminary figures suggest that in 2024, electric cars outsold conventional ones for the first time in China.

Explore data on electric car sales for more countries

Continue reading
A world map that highlights countries where women face restrictions on their right to work compared to men. The areas shaded in dark red indicate where husbands can prevent their wives from working, or where women require additional permissions for employment. Included text notes specific examples: Afghanistan, where the Taliban imposes strict restrictions on women's right to work outside the home, and Yemen, where women may work but often need permission from a male guardian and could face legal repercussions if they do not comply. The map is surrounded by a header that reads, "Where are women not allowed to take the same jobs as men?" and provides context about the legal implications of these restrictions. Data sources listed at the bottom include the World Bank's report titled "Women, Business and the Law" for the year 2024, with a note stating that the data is from 2023. The copyright attribution is indicated as CC BY.

In some countries, women still don’t have the same freedom to work as men

Many previous generations of women in my family would not have been allowed to do the work I do today — even if computers, the Internet, and Our World in Data had existed then. Thankfully, that’s no longer the case where I live: I’ve had the same right to get an education, work, and build a career as my brother.

Unfortunately, that’s not the case everywhere.

The map highlights the countries where women had legal restrictions on their rights to work in formal employment in 2023. All are in the Middle East, North Africa, or Sub-Saharan Africa.

These restrictions can include the need for permission or documentation from a male family member — such as a husband or brother — to work, or legal consequences if they don’t follow working restrictions.

While nearly 20 countries still have these legal barriers for women, this number was much larger in the past: in 1970, it was almost 70.

This data only reflects legal restrictions on working rights. In other countries, strong social or cultural pressures still mean that women are less likely to be in formal employment than men, even if they’re legally allowed to.

Explore more data on female participation in the workforce

Continue reading
A line graph illustrates the daily hours spent with children by women and men in the U.S., across men and women's lifetimes.

The y-axis indicates hours per day spent with children, ranging from 0 to 6 hours. The x-axis represents the ages from 15 to 80. 

Notable points include:
- Women aged 35 spend more than 5 hours daily with children.
- Men aged 35 spend about 3 hours daily with children.

Overall, the graph demonstrates that women consistently spend more time with children than men across all ages.

Data source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023). Note: The analysis considers underage children related to the surveyed individual and those living in the same household (e.g. step-children) and includes all time spent with the child in the same room.

Women in the US spend more time with children than men do, across all ages

In the United States, women spend more time with children than men. This is true for adults of any age.

The difference is especially large for people in their 20s and 30s. For example, at age 35, women spend an average of five hours per day with children, while men spend around three hours. (Considered here are people’s children, step and foster children, grandchildren, and other family members under 18.)

Although the gap is smaller for older people, even in later life, women spend more time with children than men.

This gap reflects traditional gender roles, where women do more childcare and less paid work. But it also has broader implications: women spend less time with friends and alone than men, which may affect their social connections, leisure, and well-being.

This data comes from the American Time Use Survey by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Learn more about how men and women spend their time throughout life

Continue reading

Get Data Insights delivered to your inbox

Receive an email from us when we publish a Data Insight (every few days).

By subscribing you are agreeing to the terms of our privacy policy.

Explore our data

Featured data from our collection of 14,359 interactive charts.

See all our data

What share of children die before their fifth birthday?

What could be more tragic than the death of a young child? Child mortality, the death of children under the age of five, is still extremely common in our world today.

The historical data makes clear that it doesn’t have to be this way: it is possible for societies to protect their children and reduce child mortality to very low rates. For child mortality to reach low levels, many things have to go right at the same time: good healthcare, good nutrition, clean water and sanitation, maternal health, and high living standards. We can, therefore, think of child mortality as a proxy indicator of a country’s living conditions.

The chart shows our long-run data on child mortality, which allows you to see how child mortality has changed in countries around the world.

Explore and learn more about this data
Explore and learn more about this data

Share of population living in extreme povertyWorld Bank

Life expectancy at birthLong-run estimates collated from multiple sources by Our World in Data

Per capita CO₂ emissionsLong-run estimates from the Global Carbon Budget

GDP per capitaLong-run estimates from the Maddison Project Database

Share of people that are undernourishedFAO

Literacy rateLong-run estimates collated from multiple sources by Our World in Data

Share of the population with access to electricityWorld Bank

Data explorers

See all our Data Explorers

Interactive visualization tools to explore a wide range of related indicators.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Receive our latest work by email.
By subscribing you are agreeing to the terms of our privacy policy.

All our topics

All our data, research, and writing — topic by topic.

Population and Demographic Change

Health

Energy and Environment

Food and Agriculture

Poverty and Economic Development

Education and Knowledge

Innovation and Technological Change

Living Conditions, Community and Wellbeing

Human Rights and Democracy

Violence and War